Re: Experimental countrychooser branch
Quoting Herbert Xu (email@example.com):
> I do not see how you can justify it by the Social Contract . You're
> basically trading the interest of 30 million people against that of
> 1 billion.
I do not really see where is the interest of 1 billion people when we
maintain strict compliance to a standard that we know has no single
If iso-3166 is able to justify their use of the current name for the TW
country, then we will maintain the use of the standard. But they have
to justify it with real arguments, not fake arguments. The ones they
give on their web site is currently a fake argument.