[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#245411: marked as done (Debian installation-reports)



Your message dated Thu, 29 Apr 2004 22:06:37 -0700
with message-id <[🔎] 20040430050637.GA15865@tara>
and subject line Done and more info?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Apr 2004 02:04:21 +0000
>From eraxxon@alumni.rice.edu Thu Apr 22 19:04:21 2004
Return-path: <eraxxon@alumni.rice.edu>
Received: from albatross.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.120] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BGq3B-0008S1-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 19:04:21 -0700
Received: from user95.net1089.va.sprint-hsd.net ([69.34.254.95] helo=Nesini)
	by albatross.mail.pas.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
	id 1BGq38-0007V2-00
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 19:04:19 -0700
Message-ID: <[🔎] 000b01c428d7$490599c0$0200a8c0@Nesini>
Reply-To: "Nathan Tallent" <eraxxon@alumni.rice.edu>
From: "Nathan Tallent" <eraxxon@alumni.rice.edu>
To: <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Debian installation-reports
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 22:04:10 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1


Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version:
  Snapshot from 2004-04-21

http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20040421/sarge-i386-netinst.iso

uname -a: <The result of running uname -a on a shell prompt>
  ***

Date: 2004-04-22

Method: CD

Machine:     Dell Dimension 8300 Series
Processor:   Pentium 4 3.0 GHz w/ HT
Memory:      2 Gb DDR

Root Device: SATA disk #2
Root Size/partition table:
  /        119.4 Gb  ext3   primary
  swap     510 Mb    swap   logical

Output of lspci:
  ***

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network:         [O]
Detect CD:              [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives:     [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O] [comment]
Create file systems:    [O]
Mount partitions:       [O]
Install base system:    [O]
Install boot loader:    [O] [comment] (on SATA #2)
Reboot:                 [E]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

* Partition hard drives
  - Is 510 MB really the largest swap partition possible!? I was
    expecting to create a swap partition of about 2-4 Gb!

* Install boot loader
  - During installation of GRUB, d-i incorrectly thought that
    Debian was the only OS on the system.  Windows is on SATA #1.
    I use want to use the BIOS to switch between boots and don't
    want GRUB on the first disk.

  - d-i then said "that I needed to install GRUB somewhere and could
    use hdn or /dev notation.  I suggest listing a couple of examples,
    since no Linux newbie would know what this means.  E.g.
      disk 1 = hd0
      disk 2 = hd1

* Reboot: Major problem.  Here's the error message:
  root (hd1,0)
   Filesystem type unknown, partition type 0xde
  kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.xxx root=/dev/hde1 ro

  Error 17: Cannot mount selected partition

  A google search found fdisk/part.c, revealing that
    0xDE, "Dell Maint  ", "Dell maintenance partition"

  As I do have a Dell [see above], this makes some sense.
  However, I let d-i partition the drive for me... I don't know
  why the 0xde is showing up.

* For good measure I tried the installation more than once...  The
  first time, I was presented with an option for choosing between
  kernel 2.6.3 and 2.4.25, and I picked the former.  Second and third
  times d-i chose 2.4.25 by default, without presenting the option.
  Why would this be?  What is d-i doing?  (I want 2.6!)

* I have heard good things about Debian and am anxious to begin trying it!



---------------------------------------
Received: (at 245411-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Apr 2004 05:06:38 +0000
>From scott@tranzoa.com Thu Apr 29 22:06:38 2004
Return-path: <scott@tranzoa.com>
Received: from mx-2.azc.com [64.213.38.231] 
	by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BJQEP-00018C-00; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 22:06:38 -0700
Received: (qmail 6620 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2004 05:06:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO tara) (216.254.27.160)
  by mx-2.azc.com with SMTP; 30 Apr 2004 05:06:36 -0000
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 22:06:37 -0700
From: Scott Robinson <scott@tranzoa.com>
To: Nathan Tallent <eraxxon@alumni.rice.edu>
Cc: 245411-done@bugs.debian.org, 246327@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Done and more info?
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20040430050637.GA15865@tara>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="liOOAslEiF7prFVr"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: 245411-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2


--liOOAslEiF7prFVr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks for your installation reports!

I have closed the first one since the second (newer) report is as rehash of
the same issues.

This sounds like a major case of hard drive confusion. First off, let's
ignore your definitions of SATA #1 and SATA #2.

Could you attach outputs from Linux fdisk for both drives (and the
identifiers used) as well as your complete grub configuration? (Found in
/boot/grub/)

Scott.

--=20
http://quadhome.com/            - Personal webpage
http://tranzoa.net/             - Corporate webpage

--liOOAslEiF7prFVr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkCR3t0ACgkQfOrjFoFaMKKNoACeMC5YRGoMYLlJ0RdrJGdKTPCX
GycAn1Mgq3bxXeey+8HCC31kfp0lIoUl
=2z/A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--liOOAslEiF7prFVr--



Reply to: