Re: Removing unused d-i udebs from archive
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On 5.IV.2004 at 01:08 Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>> > Eeeww... why was this? I remember partman/libparted had trouble
>> > making DVH disklabels... was that the only reason for MIPS?
> There is also a problem with the numbering of the partitions (#238838,
> #220990). I have fixed it in partman (though I am holding my commits
> because of the string freeze). I suppose that in the next release of
> the installer partconf will not be necessary on mips, but partitioner
That would definitely be an improvement, anyway. If we can kill partconf,
keeping partioner isn't quite so bad.
>> > What's the problem for arm?
>> Lack of support for several arm subarch partitioning schemes.
> So far I (and probably the maintainers of parted also) have no info
> about this. :-(
> Anton Zinoviev
Make sure your vote will count.