[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#221594: marked as done (init script bug - '--disable=XXX' is not working properly)



Your message dated Tue, 06 Apr 2004 11:14:14 +0200
with message-id <E1BAmes-0005iW-00@minerva.hungry.com>
and subject line Problem is solved
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Nov 2003 08:36:11 +0000
>From robin@gareus.org Wed Nov 19 02:36:10 2003
Return-path: <robin@gareus.org>
Received: from 12-208-5-235.client.attbi.com ([127.0.0.1]) [12.208.5.235] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AMNoo-0006FI-00; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 02:36:10 -0600
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robin Gareus <robin@gareus.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: init script bug - '--disable=XXX' is not working properly
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 00:35:41 -0800
X-Debbugs-Cc: robin@gareus.org
Message-Id: <E1AMNoo-0006FI-00@master.debian.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
	tests=HAS_PACKAGE
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: discover
Version: 1.5-1.4.1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

I changed the default config not to load the lp.o module by:
20c20
< boot all
---
> boot all --disable=parallel

But the module is loaded anyway - when discover is called to get the
cdrom device list. 

simple fix:
$ diff discover.old discover.works
131c131
<     for CDROM in $(discover --device cdrom)
---
>     for CDROM in $(discover --device cdrom $ARGUMENTS)
                                                                                
greetings,
robin


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux spektr 2.4.22-ac4 #20 Sun Sep 28 12:40:59 PDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages discover depends on:
ii  ash                         0.4.19       Compatibility package for the Debi
ii  dash                        0.4.19       The Debian Almquist Shell
ii  debconf                     1.3.20       Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdiscover1                1.5-1.4.1    hardware identification library

-- debconf information excluded


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 217788-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Apr 2004 09:14:47 +0000
>From pere@gigs.hungry.com Tue Apr 06 02:14:47 2004
Return-path: <pere@gigs.hungry.com>
Received: from 217-13-7-10.dd.nextgentel.com (minerva.hungry.com) [217.13.7.10] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BAmfP-00010M-00; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 02:14:47 -0700
Received: from pere by minerva.hungry.com with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BAmes-0005iW-00; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 11:14:14 +0200
To: 217788-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Problem is solved
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Message-Id: <E1BAmes-0005iW-00@minerva.hungry.com>
Sender: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@gigs.hungry.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 11:14:14 +0200
Delivered-To: 217788-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 1


This was not an NMU, but a real upload from the maintainers CVS.



Reply to: