[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#109763: marked as done (discover: no way to use one module name for kernel 2.2 and another for kernel 2.4)

Your message dated Sat, 03 Apr 2004 11:31:29 +0200
with message-id <E1B9hUv-0003wv-00@minerva.hungry.com>
and subject line discover: no way to use one module name for kernel 2.2 and another for kernel 2.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Aug 2001 13:12:16 +0000
>From KaiL@monkey.linuxfaqs.de Thu Aug 23 08:12:16 2001
Return-path: <KaiL@monkey.linuxfaqs.de>
Received: from p3e9e5a27.dip.t-dialin.net (Monkey.linuxfaqs.de) [] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 15ZuHP-0001wE-00; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 08:12:15 -0500
Received: by Monkey.linuxfaqs.de
	via sendmail from stdin
	id <m15ZuHr-0008MhC@Monkey.linuxfaqs.de> (Debian Smail3.2.0.111)
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 15:12:43 +0200 (CEST) 
Message-Id: <m15ZuHr-0008MhC@Monkey.linuxfaqs.de>
From: Kai Lahmann <KaiL@Monkey.linuxfaqs.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: the module for the Realtek 8139 NIC ins#T "rtl8139" any bmore. IT#s called 8139too now.
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.23
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.23
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 15:12:43 +0200
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: discover
Version: 1.0-1
Severity: normal
Tags: sid

-- System Information
Debian Release: unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux Monkey 2.4.9 #11 Fre Aug 17 14:14:13 CEST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=de_DE.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=de_DE

Versions of packages discover depends on:
ii  ash                           0.3.8-24   NetBSD /bin/sh
ii  libc6                         2.2.4-1    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdiscover1                  1.0-1      hardware discovery and detection l

Received: (at 109763-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2004 09:32:02 +0000
>From pere@gigs.hungry.com Sat Apr 03 01:32:02 2004
Return-path: <pere@gigs.hungry.com>
Received: from 217-13-7-10.dd.nextgentel.com (minerva.hungry.com) [] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1B9hVR-0001tF-00; Sat, 03 Apr 2004 01:32:02 -0800
Received: from pere by minerva.hungry.com with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1B9hUv-0003wv-00; Sat, 03 Apr 2004 11:31:29 +0200
To: 109763-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: discover: no way to use one module name for kernel 2.2 and another for kernel 2.4
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Message-Id: <E1B9hUv-0003wv-00@minerva.hungry.com>
Sender: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@gigs.hungry.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2004 11:31:29 +0200
Delivered-To: 109763-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 

Version 2 of discover is now in Debian Unstable.  This problem is
fixable, as the version 2 dataformat support having kernel modules
change from kernel version to kernel version.

Because of this, I close this bug.

Reply to: