[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#240911:



Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: beta-3 100MB install image [i386]
uname -a: not applicable
Date: 2004-03-29:20:00:00
Method: Boot from CD-ROM

Machine: No-Name
Processor: Pentium III 1.3 GHz
Memory: 512 MB
Root Device: IDE: second disk
Root Size/partition table: part1:512 MB swap, part2:30 GB ReiserFs
Output of lspci: not applicable

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:    [x]
Configure network HW:   [x] (not main problem, see notes)
Config network:         [x] (not main problem, see notes)
Detect CD:              [x]
Load installer modules: [x]
Detect hard drives:     [x]
Partition hard drives:  [x] (not main problem, see notes)
Create file systems:    [x]
Mount partitions:       [x]
Install base system:    [x]
Install boot loader:    [E]
Reboot:                 [E]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

First some comments that are unrelated to the errors that I got later:

Network:
- I use ADSL to connect to the internet. DHCP fails. I find it strange that I can't go on without putting in a fantasy ip address.
- When asked for default gateway the text says I can leave it blank. This, however results in an error and I have to put something in.
Partitioning:
- I consider myself quite experienced in installing Debian. I don't know what LVM is, though and got lost in some (to me meaningless) submenus before realising that I have to select "format".

Now on to the real problem:
I currently have SID running off /dev/hdb2 (hdb1 is swap) with lilo in hdb2 that I chainload from the Windows NT bootloader on /dev/hda (I use dd to write the hdb2 boosector to a file and move that to my hda partition). I removed the hdb drive and replaced it with a blank one.
I wanted the new system to work exactly the same way. This is what I did (I tried several times. Numbers in parenthesis correspond to the different tries):

- Booted from d-i beta3 CD-ROM
(1) Created hdb1 (512 MB swap) and hdb2 (30 GB Reiserfs /)
(1) Entered hd(1,1) for GRUB installation. GRUB fails. Console 3 says that it failed in stage 2 (I didn't copy the full message to paper)
(1) Now LILO installation comes up (I guess because GRUB failed). After being totally dumbfounded by the ...target/disc/lun/ stuff I decide to poke around /dev/ on console 2 and find out what to put there by analysing the contents of /dev/ide/
(1) I mount a vfat partition and dd if=<the same target/lun/part combination as above> of=<mounted vfat partiton> bs=512 count=1
(1) I select reboot and see GRUB installing (WTF?)
(1) As was expected, after copying the bootsector file to my windows partition and rebooting a GRUB bootblock is chainloaded and hangs displaying just GRUB once.

(1) Trying to boot from CD with linux root=/dev/hdb2 stops with kernel-panic

- Booted from d-i beta3 CD-ROM
(2) Created hdb1 (512 MB swap), hdb2 (20 MB ext3 /boot) and hdb3 (30 GB Reiserfs /)
(2) GRUB hd(1,1) doesn't fail this time.
(2) The rest is the same as in (1), again system hangs at "GRUB"

(2) Trying to boot from CD with linux root=/dev/hdb2 stops with kernel-panic

- Booted from d-i beta3 CD-ROM
(3) Created hdb1 (512 MB swap), hdb2 (20 MB ext3 /boot) and hdb3 (30 GB XFS /)
(3) GRUB hd(1,1) doesn't fail this time either.
(3) The rest is the same as in (1), again system hangs at "GRUB"

(3) Trying to boot from CD with linux root=/dev/hdb2 stops with kernel-panic

- Booted from d-i beta3 CD-ROM
(4) Created hdb1 (512 MB swap) and hdb2 (30 GB XFS /)
(4) Skipped bootloader installation as the installer told me that XFS doesn't allow a bootblock on a partition

(4) Trying to boot from CD with linux root=/dev/hdb2 stops with kernel-panic


Conclusion: After 3 hours I gave up and put my old drive back in. Maybe I would have gotten it to work if there was a rescue image in the installer CD, which would have allowed me to get into my installation and tweak lilo.conf manually (this is the way I had set up my current system using woody).





Reply to: