[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#235375: marked as done (autopartitioning scheme makes /var too small)



Your message dated Mon, 15 Mar 2004 19:11:33 +0200
with message-id <20040315171132.GA3320@lml.bas.bg>
and subject line Bug#235375: autopartitioning scheme makes /var too big
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Feb 2004 00:13:11 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Sat Feb 28 16:13:11 2004
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AxEZz-0000j4-00; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:13:11 -0800
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (pm3naxs21-20.access.naxs.com [216.98.95.20])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
	by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD5B17FCE
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 00:13:10 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id B265F6F3B0; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 19:13:25 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 19:13:25 -0500
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: autopartitioning scheme makes /var too big
Message-ID: <20040229001325.GA8453@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6TrnltStXW4iwmi0"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.48
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_27 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=CIALIS,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_27
X-Spam-Level: 


--6TrnltStXW4iwmi0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: partman
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i

I picked the automatic partitioning scheme that create /, home/, /var/,
/var/mail/, /usr/local, etc. It thinks that 970 mb out of 40 gb is
enough for /var; in my experience this is a bit low due to apt cache.
Also, the 1.5 gb /var/mail partition makes this seem a rather
specialised scheme, only for mail servers. Combinding that into /var for
a 2.5 gb /var would be more general, IMHO. (This scheme also gave me a
2.1 gb unmounted partition that was supposed to be swap, see other bug).

-- System Information:
Found unknown policy: ('1', 'pool')Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25
Locale: LANG=3Den_US, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US

--=20
see shy jo

--6TrnltStXW4iwmi0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAQS6ld8HHehbQuO8RAt3zAJ9LNo8P7mGO/5KxmyLNZPt3MEPL5gCcDVt2
1Yg7ofEfAUSkXHQ1XMrxMJE=
=HO2+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--6TrnltStXW4iwmi0--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 235375-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Mar 2004 17:06:30 +0000
>From anton@lml.bas.bg Mon Mar 15 09:06:30 2004
Return-path: <anton@lml.bas.bg>
Received: from lml.bas.bg [195.96.224.121] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1B2vXq-0002F3-00; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 09:06:30 -0800
Received: from anton by lml.bas.bg with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1B2vcj-00016g-00
	for <235375-done@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 19:11:33 +0200
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 19:11:33 +0200
From: Anton Zinoviev <anton@lml.bas.bg>
To: 235375-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#235375: autopartitioning scheme makes /var too big
Message-ID: <20040315171132.GA3320@lml.bas.bg>
References: <20040229001325.GA8453@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040229001325.GA8453@kitenet.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: 235375-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,CIALIS,
	HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
X-Spam-Level: 

On 28.II.2004 at 19:13 Joey Hess wrote:
> 
> I picked the automatic partitioning scheme that create /, home/, /var/,
> /var/mail/, /usr/local, etc. It thinks that 970 mb out of 40 gb is
> enough for /var; in my experience this is a bit low due to apt cache.
> Also, the 1.5 gb /var/mail partition makes this seem a rather
> specialised scheme, only for mail servers. Combinding that into /var for
> a 2.5 gb /var would be more general, IMHO. (This scheme also gave me a
> 2.1 gb unmounted partition that was supposed to be swap, see other bug).

This partitioning scheme doesn't exist any more.

Anton Zinoviev



Reply to: