Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > It's useful if you don't like the scheme you chose, or if you didn't > > choose to autopartition, or if you edit something and mess it up, etc. > > Would it be possible to only show it when it actually is useful. In > my case, choosing it basically was a noop. I don't see how it could be a no-op. At a minium, you could choose the other partitioning scheme. > > I agree. Unfortunatly, the default partitioner currently varies by > > architecture, so we cannot call one "Partiton disks (old partitioner)". > > I am relucatant to pull in terminology the user won't understand, such > > as "Partition disks (partman)". Suggestions? > > Not sure. Maybe "Partition disks" and "Partition disks (cfdisk)" > since cfdisk might be a term people understand... but that's not ideal > either. I'm sorry I don't have a good solution either. :/ cfdisk is not used on all architectures. There's also the queston of what to call partconf. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature