Bug#237406: marked as done (XFS file system does not accept errors=remount-ro)
Your message dated Thu, 11 Mar 2004 17:44:15 +0100
with message-id <20040311174415.A28200@macwheel.xs4all.nl>
and subject line partman xfs: bad entry in /etc/fstab
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Mar 2004 12:55:35 +0000
>From anton@lml.bas.bg Thu Mar 11 04:55:35 2004
Return-path: <anton@lml.bas.bg>
Received: from lml.bas.bg [195.96.224.121]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B1Pio-0002Ly-00; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 04:55:35 -0800
Received: from anton by lml.bas.bg with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1B1Png-0002rU-00; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:00:36 +0200
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:00:35 +0200
From: Anton Zinoviev <anton@lml.bas.bg>
To: Erich Waelde <Erich.Waelde@t-online.de>, submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: XFS file system does not accept errors=remount-ro
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20040311130035.GE3829@lml.bas.bg>
References: <[🔎] 16464.10786.808608.272698@artemis.standalone>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 16464.10786.808608.272698@artemis.standalone>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08
X-Spam-Level:
Package: partman-xfs
Severity: important
Tags: d-i
On 11.III.2004 at 09:58 Erich Waelde wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I did a vmware install using
> http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/i386/20040309/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
>
>
> I did a typo in the boot line and ended in the default install :-)
> Thus I got to use the new partitioner partman.
>
> I was impressed to see a message, that xfs for /boot is not such a good
> idea, so I went back to repartition ... very impressive.
>
> In general I didn't like the many menus, but I can see that the logic
> behind it is much more capable. So I'll get used to it, I guess.
>
>
> So I chose
> /dev/discs/disc0/part1 => 128 MB swap
> /dev/discs/disc0/part2 => 32 MB ext3 /boot
> /dev/discs/disc0/part1 => 800 MB xfs /
>
> The reboot failed into some strange state. I was able to get in adding
> init=/bin/bash
> to the boot options. / was mounted readonly.
>
> I found that /etc/fstab was the source of the problem
>
> /dev/sda3 / xfs defaults,errors=remount-ro 0 1
> --------------------------^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> instead of ignoring, mount (of xfs) will fail with this option.
> I managed to remount
> mount -o remount,rw -t xfs /dev/sda3 /
> and change the file.
>
> If someone will tell me, which package exactly this should go, I'll resend
> as a bug report.
>
> The rest of the install was a piece of cake! Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
> Erich
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 237406-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Mar 2004 16:44:22 +0000
>From stappers@stappers.nl Thu Mar 11 08:44:22 2004
Return-path: <stappers@stappers.nl>
Received: from gpm.stappers.nl [213.84.119.166]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B1TID-0003zX-00; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 08:44:22 -0800
Received: by gpm.stappers.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 00ED21800; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 17:44:15 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 17:44:15 +0100
To: 237406-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: partman xfs: bad entry in /etc/fstab
Message-ID: <20040311174415.A28200@macwheel.xs4all.nl>
References: <[🔎] 16464.10786.808608.272698@artemis.standalone> <[🔎] 20040311163722.GC30470@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20040311163722.GC30470@kitenet.net>; from joeyh@debian.org on Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 11:37:22AM -0500
From: stappers@stappers.nl (Geert Stappers)
Delivered-To: 237406-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08
X-Spam-Level:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 11:37:22AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Erich Waelde wrote:
> > I did a vmware install using
> > http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/i386/20040309/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
>
> That's a day out of date, and almost two.
>
> > I found that /etc/fstab was the source of the problem
> >
> > /dev/sda3 / xfs defaults,errors=remount-ro 0 1
> > --------------------------^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Yes, this was fixed two days ago though.
>
> --
> see shy jo
Reply to: