Bug#229970: marked as done (.../i82365.o: init_module: No such device)
Your message dated Thu, 11 Mar 2004 03:44:28 -0500
with message-id <20040311084428.GD2296@squee.verizon.net>
and subject line This was closed in a previous upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jan 2004 18:41:24 +0000
>From Jan.Minar@seznam.cz Tue Jan 27 10:41:24 2004
Return-path: <Jan.Minar@seznam.cz>
Received: from ns1.deusystems.com (deusystems.cz) [212.80.75.66]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AlY9L-00052h-00; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 10:41:23 -0800
Received: (qmail 29134 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2004 18:41:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO kontryhel) (10.10.8.133)
by kerberos.deusystems.com with SMTP; 27 Jan 2004 18:41:19 -0000
Received: from jan by kontryhel with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AlY5X-0006iI-00
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 19:37:27 +0100
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 19:37:27 +0100
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: .../i82365.o: init_module: No such device
Message-ID: <20040127183727.GA25796@kontryhel>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Jan Minar <Jan.Minar@seznam.cz>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_25
X-Spam-Level:
--h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: discover
Version: 1.1-6
Severity: normal
Hi!
It seems discover tries to load the i82365 module, while loading
yenta_socket would be appropriate. IIRC, yenta_socket works with 2.4
kernels for me, while i82365 works with the 2.2 line (YMMW).
The actual error messages were:
| # apt-get install discover
| [...]
| Setting up discover (1.1-6) ...
| [...]
| /lib/modules/2.4.24-jan/kernel/drivers/pcmcia/i82365.o: init_module: No
| such device
| Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters,
| including invalid IO or IRQ parameters
| /lib/modules/2.4.24-jan/kernel/drivers/pcmcia/i82365.o: insmod
| /lib/modules/2.4.24-jan/kernel/drivers/pcmcia/i82365.o failed
| /lib/modules/2.4.24-jan/kernel/drivers/pcmcia/i82365.o: insmod i82365
| failed
Maybe looking in the /etc/default/pcmcia would be appropriate?
/etc/default/pcmcia:
[...]
PCIC=yenta_socket
[...]
If you needed an additional info to make use of this bugreport, please
ask for it.
Oh, I've just learned the i82365 is skipped when I run
/etc/init.d/discover [re]start now; 'tis nice, but the point about
looking in the pcmcia config still stands.
Cheers,
Jan.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux kontryhel 2.4.24-jan #8 SMP Tue Jan 6 02:08:21 CET 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8
Versions of packages discover depends on:
ii ash 0.3.8-37 NetBSD /bin/sh
ii libc6 2.2.5-11.5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libdiscover1 1.1-6 hardware identification library
--h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQFAFq/n+uczK20Fa5cRArT5AJ4wqYM4ZI1IHIAJLqacn7Usv1CiqACgiLwU
h9n0cy79TFRielfYyCdteng=
=0sld
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 229970-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Mar 2004 08:44:30 +0000
>From naughtynus@verizon.net Thu Mar 11 00:44:30 2004
Return-path: <naughtynus@verizon.net>
Received: from out011pub.verizon.net (out011.verizon.net) [206.46.170.135]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B1Lnq-0000lI-00; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 00:44:30 -0800
Received: from squee ([141.149.184.115]) by out011.verizon.net
(InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP
id <20040311084429.NXGU18566.out011.verizon.net@squee>
for <229970-done@bugs.debian.org>;
Thu, 11 Mar 2004 02:44:29 -0600
Received: by squee (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id BC5E746D83; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 03:44:28 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 03:44:28 -0500
From: David Nusinow <david_nusinow@verizon.net>
To: 229970-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: This was closed in a previous upload
Message-ID: <20040311084428.GD2296@squee.verizon.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out011.verizon.net from [141.149.184.115] at Thu, 11 Mar 2004 02:44:29 -0600
Delivered-To: 229970-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08
X-Spam-Level:
I'm not sure exactly which upload this was closed in, most likely the
last one, but it is now fixed. Thank you!
- David Nusinow
Reply to: