* Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com> [2004-02-26 01:45]: | <joeyh@debian.org> wrote: | >I agree, and deciding one way or the other on partman will help, since | >we can drop the other one to a low priority and out of memory. | | Well, I think partman rocks. Notably, a lot of people working on extra | architectures and subarchitectures appear to be hoping that partman takes | over, because it means that they just have to get libparted support for their | architecture, rather than making udebs of various and sundry tools and | supporting all their different interfaces in debconf. I think that's reason | enough to switch to it. Furthermore, it's actually pretty spiffy. :-) Hmm. Are we shipping the "normal" architecture based programs/applets/...(lvm2tools,mac-fidsk,...) also? Bye Thorsten -- Thorsten Sauter <tsauter@gmx.net> (Is there life after /sbin/halt -p?)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature