[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#227852: kbd-chooser: [PATCH] another sparc->sun change



Package: kbd-chooser
Severity: normal
Followup-For: Bug #227852

Hi, I found another change to do :

Rationale for others persons : the console-keymaps package for sparc is
console-keymaps-sun. In kbd-chooser.h, there is a option which defines
the preferred keymap package for sparc architecture and the name must be
"sun" instead of "sparc".

The second patch corrects a same error in TODO file, it's not very
important.

Once this patch is applied, it would be very appreciated if you do a
upload, because this bug blocks sparc testing, even if it's not the 
only one :)

Thanks for your work

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.24-1-k7
Locale: LANG=fr_FR@euro, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR@euro


-- 
Thomas Poindessous

Index: kbd-chooser.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/d-i/debian-installer/tools/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser.h,v
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -r1.14 kbd-chooser.h
--- kbd-chooser.h	21 Jan 2004 14:00:45 -0000	1.14
+++ kbd-chooser.h	11 Feb 2004 22:56:45 -0000
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
 extern int check_dir (const char *dirname);
 
 #ifdef SPARC_KBD
-#define PREFERRED_KBD "sparc"
+#define PREFERRED_KBD "sun"
 #endif
 
 #ifndef __m68k__
Index: TODO
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/d-i/debian-installer/tools/kbd-chooser/TODO,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.7 TODO
--- TODO	29 Jul 2003 18:21:59 -0000	1.7
+++ TODO	11 Feb 2004 22:56:26 -0000
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 - on netinst, all console-keymap-* packages are installed.
   Try installing only the ones that are required (eg don't pull in
-  console-keymaps-sparc on an i386 install)
+  console-keymaps-sun on an i386 install)
 
 - Only install console-keymaps-at on arm arch for the appropriate
   hardware.

Reply to: