Sven Luther wrote: > Well, the question is, do we go, bypass the buildds, and try to build > 0.2.25 by hand ? Or do you mean that 0.2.25 can go to testing even if > only for powerpc and i386 ? That's right, 0.2.25 was forced in for only i386 and powerpc. 0.2.26 seems to have quickly built on most arches and it should enter testing soon. > > Unfortunatly, beta 2's businesscard ISOs will remain broken, since they > > include a broken deboostrap-udeb on the ISO but pull debs from sarge. > > Getting it in will fix netboot type installs though. I've removed the > > prominant link to them from the d-i web page. > > Well, what is stopping us from rebuilding them ? beta2.1 or something > such ? Lack of time to make sure they're worth being called beta 2 on my part, at least. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature