[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: d-i on Alpha: failed installation



On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 10:57:12AM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
> I'm finally catching up on debian mailing list messages that I've been
> ignoring for the last couple of weeks...

> | Cameron,
> [...]
> | > It looks to me like the first three characters in the link in
> | > /dev/cdroms should have been '../'.  In case they get mangled by email,
> | 
> | Well, as it turns out, these symlinks are generated by the kernel itself
> | as part of devfs.  Can you please verify that this is a reproducible
> | error?

> It seems to be reproducible on the CD that I'm using (which is a few
> weeks old now) - I tried it again this morning which would make it the
> third time I've seen it.  Perhaps it might be a dodgy burn, but I would
> have thought that this would manifest itself in different ways (i.e. not
> being able to boot at all).

Well, I don't see that I've had any other tests by alpha users with SCSI
CD-ROMs to confirm or deny this; so it could be either a dodgy burn, or
a kernel problem.

> | and I think it would be quite a serious problem if the kernel was
> | generating broken devfs symlinks on a regular basis (instead of, say,
> | due to a cosmic ray hitting your machine ;).

> Yes.  I'll try a newer daily image later today and see if that fixes it.
> Do the newer builds contain a different kernel?

Yes, the latest builds are using a 2.4.24 kernel.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: pgpgqeg6EYKAo.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: