On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 10:30:06PM +0100, Jeremie Koenig wrote: > On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 03:25:55PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > Joey Hess wrote: > > > > +elif [ -d modules/$flavour ]; then > > > > + modlistdir=modules/$flavour > > > > > > Looks like this would also allow the i386 xfs kernel to look like this > > > in kernel-versions: > > > > > > i386 2.4.22 xfs ... > > > > > > And use the modules/i386-xfs directory. Steve? > > Er, no it won't. I suppose the flavor could be 386-xfs though. > Well, with i386 as the arch and xfs as the falvour, it'll use > modules/i386-xfs, it's the line just above my own addition. The issue I've been having is getting the uname output of the kernel-image packages to match what we need to see, so that package names can be autodetected by the installer *and* we can simplify the use of flavor names. Just needs a bit of attention, I'm sure. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
pgpX2OjNIvGTH.pgp
Description: PGP signature