Re: ia64 install report
Quoting Richard Hirst (rhirst@linuxcare.com):
> The obvious difference to me is that in base-installer, all the
> Description names are Description-*.UTF-8, while in elilo-installer they
> are all .ISO-8859-2, or EUC-JP, or whatever.
Yes, this is the sign of a missing debian/po/output file
I guess that elilo-installer on the system you tested was an
older than 2 weeks version. This output file was added 2 weeks ago according
to CVS (Wed Dec 24 08:50:33 2003 UTC)
>
>
> I then built a new elilo-installer from head, and its templates file
> uses UTF-8, so I conclude that we should build/upload a new
> elilo-installer. So far as beta2 is concerned, I tried an install in
> French, and all was well, except the one dialog from elilo was in
> English. I guess we can live with that for now.
Yes, your conclusion is right. 0.0.2 upload happend on Dec 15th
The english dialog in beta2 for french installation is a direct
consequence of the wrong encoding, thus logical.
Reply to: