Bug#189808: marked as done (netcfg: In initial install ifconfig is used, but only ip is in busybox any more)
Your message dated Sun, 27 Apr 2003 16:32:43 +0200
with message-id <20030427143243.GA14058@dolphy.pangea.at>
and subject line Fixed in 26apr03 testing images
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Apr 2003 10:25:58 +0000
>From ralph@pangea.at Sun Apr 20 05:25:58 2003
Return-path: <ralph@pangea.at>
Received: from lilzclust02.liwest.at (lilzcluster.liwest.at) [212.33.55.12]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 197C1F-0000cV-00; Sun, 20 Apr 2003 05:25:57 -0500
Received: from dolphy.pangea.at by lilzcluster.liwest.at (8.10.2/1.1.2.11/08Jun01-1123AM)
id h3KAPtY0001181032; Sun, 20 Apr 2003 12:25:55 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from ralph by dolphy.pangea.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 197C15-0008Vx-00; Sun, 20 Apr 2003 12:25:47 +0200
From: Ralph Aichinger <ralph@dolphy.pangea.at>
Subject: netcfg: In initial install ifconfig is used, but only ip is in busybox any more
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1
Message-Id: <[🔎] E197C15-0008Vx-00@dolphy.pangea.at>
Sender: Ralph Aichinger <ralph@pangea.at>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 12:25:47 +0200
X-Scanner: exiscan *197C15-0008Vx-00*WBvrFwPIWjg* (Medea, Verein fuer aktive Medienarbeit, Linz, Austria)
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: netcfg
Version: N/A, sorry. From netinstall CD 18 Apr 2003
Severity: grave
I hope it is ok to file this bug against the netcfg package, I was
told by Petter Reinholdtsen to file it against busybox or netcfg.
Current busybox (as included on testing CD images) only contains
ip, not ifconfig/route, although the configuration process still
uses the old commands. This makes configuring Interfaces hard, if
not impossible.
Tried with official netinstall CD images from
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/
The images were dated Apr18.
Thanks for reading this bug and sorry if I filed it against
the wrong package. It is very severe, however.
/ralph
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 189808-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Apr 2003 14:33:04 +0000
>From ralph@pangea.at Sun Apr 27 09:33:04 2003
Return-path: <ralph@pangea.at>
Received: from lilzclust02.liwest.at (lilzcluster.liwest.at) [212.33.55.12]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 199nDD-0002aH-00; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 09:33:03 -0500
Received: from dolphy.pangea.at by lilzcluster.liwest.at (8.10.2/1.1.2.11/08Jun01-1123AM)
id h3REWqW0001278532; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 16:32:52 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from ralph by dolphy.pangea.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 199nCu-0003eu-00
for <189808-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 27 Apr 2003 16:32:44 +0200
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 16:32:43 +0200
To: 189808-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Fixed in 26apr03 testing images
Message-ID: <20030427143243.GA14058@dolphy.pangea.at>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Ralph Aichinger <ralph@pangea.at>
X-Scanner: exiscan *199nCu-0003eu-00*fJwd5h55M0M* (Medea, Verein fuer aktive Medienarbeit, Linz, Austria)
Delivered-To: 189808-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Has been fixed in 26apr03 images by including ifconfig and route
in busybox, which works fine for me!
Thanks for trying to keep testing in an installable state!
/ralph
Reply to: