mån 2003-01-13 klockan 16.20 skrev Denis Barbier: > > On the other hand, it does make sense to use the text type for exactly > > these cases, instead of adding more types. We could first db_get the > > text template, and then use that string as argument to the progress > > commands. What's the problem with this? > > See #172218, I do not know what joeyh has in mind. Anyway unless tausq > objects I will apply this patch soon, so that cdebconf can be uploaded. > Having progress bar support in the slang frontend would also be nice. Yes, I seem to recall that... I think we should prod joeyh about deciding something on this. But I'm not sure it's a good idea to send the *template name* of a text template as argument to either title or progress, it makes more sense to GET the question and use that text. Or do I have to METAGET description? How does text work anyway? *confused* OK, so maybe that's an argument against using text. ;) I just don't know if a template type is the way to go. What does short and long description mean for a title or progress info? /Martin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel