Erich Waelde wrote: > Error message on installer screen (vc/0) > > Loading di-utils-device-files failed for unknown reasons. Aborting. So di-utils-devicefiles only got out of NEW the other day. At a guess, this thing has the wrong priority and should not be installed by default on i386. Or perhaps it should not be built at all on i386? Perhaps it interacts badly with devfs and this prevents it from being unpacked? > user.info anna[791]: corrupted status flag!! I wonder what this is? > user.info anna[791]: (process:1090): tar: > user.info anna[791]: (process:1090): Couldnt remove old file > user.info anna[791]: (process:1090): : Operation not permitted Seems to bear out my guess about devfs. I am uploading a new di-utils without di-utils-devicefiles. Sorry for the heavy-handed action, but it seems to me nothing currently uses this new package, and it needs to be rethought some before entering the archive. Again, PLEASE test this kind of thing before committing it! -- see shy jo, tired of utting out fires
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature