Re: (low priority) udeb naming
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 01:29:02PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Joey Hess schrieb:
> > But there are obviously other ways to guard against that if it is a
> > problem. For example, udebs could depend on broken-system, and then dpkg
> > would be pretty clear about what happens if you install them. :-)
> LOL, and rootskel could provide "broken-system" for debian-installer!
> Hopefully this does not mean that the whole debian-installer will be
> broken all the time...
> We are working to prove this "Provide" woill always be "wrong" :-)
s/broken/embryo/
Reply to: