Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > Then how do you know it is a bug in mklibs and it is not actually a > > missing symbol? > > Which was the real reason it failed in every testcase I got my hand on > so far. All of those suposedly mklibs weak symbols bugs disapeared > when recompiling the faulty binaries against the proper versions of > libraries so far. If I read between the lines right, this time it was breakage in brltty on sparc, and I've removed it from the pkg-lists for sparc now. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature