[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

udeb, the additional information



Hello,

The information I was missing a long time:

$ cvs diff -u doc/modules.txt
Index: doc/modules.txt
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/debian-boot/debian-installer/doc/modules.txt,v
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -r1.17 modules.txt
--- doc/modules.txt     28 Jul 2003 08:29:35 -0000      1.17
+++ doc/modules.txt     27 Sep 2003 23:26:26 -0000
@@ -10,15 +10,16 @@
 packages, and because it allows metadata to accompany the files in a module,
 we have decided to use debian packages as the modules for the installer. To
 differentiate them from normal Debian packages, modules have filenames
-ending in ".udeb". However, modules must not have the same package name as
-any regular Debian package.
+ending in ".udeb". The 'u' is actual the greek "mu", the symbol for micro.
+However, modules must not have the same package name as any regular Debian
+package.
  
 Unlike regular debian packages, modules for the installer will not be
 policy compliant. They will not contain documentation in /usr/share/doc.
 They need not comply with the FHS. They may be statically linked. They may
 conflict with essential "real" debian packages, and thus be non-installable
 on a real debian system, although it is recommended that if possible, this
-be avoided.
+be avoided. All this "breaking the rules" is for space reduction.
  
 Here is a short rundown on differences between deb packages and udebs:
  


Please take it into CVS.



Geert Stappers



Reply to: