Re: Building d-i as a package

To: Alastair McKinstry <mckinstry@computer.org>
Cc: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Building d-i as a package
From: Emile van Bergen <emile-deb@evbergen.xs4all.nl>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 21:37:07 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030402193707.GA17419@evbergen.xs4all.nl>
Mail-followup-to: Alastair McKinstry <mckinstry@computer.org>, debian-boot@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1049306762.1617.41.camel@coll>
References: <[🔎] 1049306762.1617.41.camel@coll>

Hi,

On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 07:06:02PM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:

> Alastair McKinstry <mckinstry@computer.org>
> GPG Key fingerprint = 9E64 E714 8E08 81F9 F3DC  1020 FA8E 3790 9051 38F4

Anybody else running gpg 1.0.6 or 1.2.x got 'BAD Signature' on this
message?

Cheers,


Emile.

-- 
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen           emile@e-advies.nl      
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153           http://www.e-advies.nl

Attachment: pgpPJ7hEJ9ADL.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Building d-i as a package
  - From: Cardenas <mbc@debian.org>
- Re: Building d-i as a package; sig provlems
  - From: Alastair McKinstry <mckinstry@computer.org>

References:
- Building d-i as a package
  - From: Alastair McKinstry <mckinstry@computer.org>

Prev by Date: Building d-i as a package
Next by Date: CD Image typo
Previous by thread: Building d-i as a package
Next by thread: Re: Building d-i as a package
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread