[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#180032: marked as done (choose-mirror: Can't change mirror if first one doesn't work)

Your message dated 24 Feb 2003 22:19:42 +0100
with message-id <1046121582.25915.79.camel@sjogren.ostkupan.studenthem.gu.se>
and subject line Bug#180032: choose-mirror: Error message for failure
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2003 18:50:27 +0000
>From tdykstra@famdijkstra.org Thu Feb 06 12:50:26 2003
Return-path: <tdykstra@famdijkstra.org>
Received: from pieck.student.uva.nl [] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18gr6Q-0000Dr-00; Thu, 06 Feb 2003 12:50:26 -0600
Received: from baardmijt ([]) by
          pieck.student.uva.nl (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP
          id H9WHO100.J12 for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 6 Feb 2003
          19:50:25 +0100 
Received: from roodbaard ([])
	by baardmijt with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18gr6N-0001MW-00; Thu, 06 Feb 2003 19:50:23 +0100
Received: from tdykstra by roodbaard with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18gr6N-00009X-00; Thu, 06 Feb 2003 19:50:23 +0100
From: "Tim Dijkstra (tdykstra)" <tim@famdijkstra.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: choose-mirror: Can't change mirror if first one doesn't work
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 19:50:23 +0100
Message-Id: <E18gr6N-00009X-00@roodbaard>
Sender: Tim Dijkstra <tdykstra@famdijkstra.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0

Package: choose-mirror
Version: N/A; reported 2003-02-06
Severity: normal

I'm not really sure if this is a bug in this package or rather in
the one that generates the menu of the installer... but here goes.

Somewhere in the process of installing I was asked to choose a mirror. It
turned out that the one I chose didn't work. After that I couldn't
try another one, none of the menu-entries would let me do that. That is
of course really annoying.

grts Tim

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux roodbaard 2.4.20 #1 di jan 14 22:17:08 CET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=nl_NL@euro, LC_CTYPE=nl_NL@euro

Received: (at 180032-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2003 21:19:49 +0000
>From md9ms@mdstud.chalmers.se Mon Feb 24 15:19:48 2003
Return-path: <md9ms@mdstud.chalmers.se>
Received: from smtp.gu.se [] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18nQ0p-0005vP-00; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 15:19:47 -0600
Received: from sjogren.ostkupan.studenthem.gu.se (sjogren.ostkupan.studenthem.gu.se [])
	by smtp.gu.se (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h1OLJkXO025691;
	Mon, 24 Feb 2003 22:19:46 +0100
Subject: Re: Bug#180032: choose-mirror: Error message for failure
From: Martin =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sj=F6gren?= <md9ms@mdstud.chalmers.se>
To: Thomas Viehmann <tv@beamnet.de>, 180032-close@bugs.debian.org
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 3E5A8792.9070202@beamnet.de>
References: <[🔎] 3E5A7987.5050409@beamnet.de>
	 <[🔎] 1046118181.25915.9.camel@sjogren.ostkupan.studenthem.gu.se>
	 <[🔎] 3E5A8792.9070202@beamnet.de>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-xXeN8WHz5mEmFmcu6tsx"
Message-Id: <1046121582.25915.79.camel@sjogren.ostkupan.studenthem.gu.se>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 
Date: 24 Feb 2003 22:19:42 +0100
Delivered-To: 180032-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

m=E5n 2003-02-24 klockan 21.58 skrev Thomas Viehmann:
> Hi.
> Martin Sj=F6gren wrote:
> > I don't see how these bug reports are related at all. Isn't this more o=
> > a cdebconf issue? It fails and everything goes boom. I think you should
> > report this on cdebconf instead.
> Like the submitter, I had a problem with the download mirror and tried to=
 change it.
> >From the original bugreport I figured that he had got back to the main m=
> Also, like him and you, I believe that this is probably a cdebconf proble=

This is solved anyway, since I uploaded a new choose-mirror that has its
own menu entry. Too bad I'd forgotten about this bug so it isn't in the
changelog. I'm closing it now instead.

> So to me it looked as it was the same bug, that's why I didn't file a new=
> (I can do so, though, if you prefer.) It probably needs to be reassigned.
> However, I don't think I'm qualified to reassign this bug. Sorry for not
> pointing this out more clearly.

Obviously something's wrong with cdebconf in your case (what did you
do?) and it should handle it more gracefully. I think you should file a
bug on cdebconf.


Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad

Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)



Reply to: