Re: [BusyBox] RFC: giving respawn init actions a controlling tty?

To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org, andersee@debian.org
Subject: Re: [BusyBox] RFC: giving respawn init actions a controlling tty?
From: Matt Kraai <kraai@alumni.cmu.edu>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 08:39:17 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 20021004153917.GA22536@valenciana>
Mail-followup-to: debian-boot@lists.debian.org, andersee@debian.org

Howdy,

The `Execute a shell' option is broken because BusyBox init does
not give controlling terminals to respawn actions.  Erik, what
would you suggest?

Matt
-- 
Freedom is not free.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [BusyBox] RFC: giving respawn init actions a controlling tty?
  - From: Matt Kraai <kraai@alumni.cmu.edu>
- Re: [BusyBox] RFC: giving respawn init actions a controlling tty?
  - From: Erik Andersen <andersen@codepoet.org>

Prev by Date: cvs commit to boot-floppies/documentation/fr by barbier
Next by Date: cvs commit to boot-floppies/documentation/fr by barbier
Previous by thread: cvs commit to boot-floppies/documentation/fr by barbier
Next by thread: Re: [BusyBox] RFC: giving respawn init actions a controlling tty?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread