Re: [d-i] libd-i building
Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 01:24:17PM +0200 wrote:
> I'm just curious, why is libd-i built as it is, every function in a
> separate .o?
The logic is that it allows us to provide a shared reduced version of
libd-i, or to statically link only the objects we need.
>
> I will probably move some package file parsing into libd-i and I want to
> know how to do this. Still one file per function I add, or one file for
> all the package-related functions? Should I start a new .c file for
> this?
If it looks like a separate .c files make sense, do that, it is up to
you.
-David
Reply to: