[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: documentation build problem



Denis Barbier (barbier@linuxfr.org) wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 06:35:26PM -0600, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
> > Richard Hirst (rhirst@linuxcare.com) wrote:
> [...]
> > > i.e. with dozens of links in the html <head>, not the <body>.  These
> > > links are not visible with mozilla, but viewing the files with lynx
> > > gives you gives screens of links at the top of each file.
> > > 
> > > If you look at the archive for this file, you'll see i386 and ia64 files
> > > are very different.  For example, ia64 has this at the top of the contents
> > > page:
> > > 
> > > [ previous ] [ Contents ] [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] [ 4 ] [ 5 ] [ 6 ] [ 7 ] [ 8 ] [ 9 ] [ 10 ] [ 11 ] [ 12 ] [ next ]
> [...]
> >
> > Yes, what's going on is a new version of the debiandoc-sgml package which
> > introduces several new things (and yes, I'm to blame for all this :-):
> > 
> >  - a reorg of the navigation bar to make it easier to move around in the
> >    document
> >  - expanding the contents links to make them easier clickable
> >  - addition of the <links> in the header so browsers that support them can
> >    make use of it
> > 
> > Unfortunately, the text based browsers 'links' and 'lynx' don't support the
> > option to view these latter links optionally, like e.g. Mozilla can.  There's
> > already a wishlist filed to add an option to debiandoc2html to add these links
> > only if indicated.  And wishlists have been filed against 'links' and 'lynx'
> > to support <link>s.
> 
> But changing this now give them very few time to implement it :(
> You could at least add an option to debiandoc2html to disable these links,

That's what the wislist is about.  Will be implemented for woody.

> I guess many people will be annoyed by them.
> 
> Moreover, have a look at http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/
> There are only 2 links:
>   <link rel="next" href="about.html">
>   <link rel="contents" href="cover.html#minitoc">
> because it does not make sense to make all these links available.

Well, apparently the people to wrote the standard thought otherwise...  Maybe it's
a matter of getting used tot them combined with personal taste.  That's why it would
be good if browsers support selecting which links to show, if any.

> Other pages have 3 links, to previous, next and toc pages.
> This looks like the right thing to do.

Well, file a wishlist with your wishes.  I'm always open to suggestions.  And often
the only way to get such suggestions is by doing the "wrong" thing, unintentional
(like in this case) or intentional.

Thanks,
Ardo
-- 
Ardo van Rangelrooij
home email: ardo@debian.org
home page:  http://people.debian.org/~ardo
GnuPG fp:   3B 1F 21 72 00 5C 3A 73  7F 72 DF D9 90 78 47 F9


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: