Bug#134045: b-f needs to be updated to compile with slang1a-utf8
Junichi Uekawa wrote on Sun Feb 17, 2002 um 06:59:06AM:
> > The only way I see is to fetch one of them, extract localy and modify
> > the patchs from Makefiles. Any better idea?
> Did we really need the two versions ?
> My impression was that we used -utf packages in both
> packages, unlesss localized b-f was to be built, which
> we won't.
Okay, I tried to make some changes in the Makefiles in EXTRACT lists.
Result: we really need an -utf8 version of programs that need
libslang. Otherwise, library compression seems to screw up the
libslang.so.1 library. libslang.so.1-UTF8.4.4 is okay, libslang.so.1 is
apparently a dummy, size: 1064 bytes.
What is to do? Create nano-utf8 package, or fix library reduction?
First option sounds better for me.
"Das hat Methode. Nur die Ahnungslosen haben genuegend Zeit, sich in
Meetings zu profilieren und Karriere zu machen. Die anderen haben tags-
ueber genug zu tun und keine Zeit fuer Schwallmeetings." [Holger Marzen]