On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 12:04:28PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > Also, what about busybox ash? Is that mature enough to use instead of > the proper ash package? Or did it have some problems? it ignores posix. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
Attachment:
pgpiRyWsKGusG.pgp
Description: PGP signature