Re: Should you use dietlibc for installation and rescue disks?

To: Juhapekka Tolvanen <juhtolv@st.jyu.fi>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Should you use dietlibc for installation and rescue disks?
From: Thierry Laronde <thierry@cri74.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 13:25:09 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010710132509.B5779@pc04.cri.cur-archamps.fr>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20010710124232.A935@silmu.st.jyu.fi>; from juhtolv@st.jyu.fi on Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 12:42:32PM +0300
References: <[🔎] 20010710124232.A935@silmu.st.jyu.fi>

On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 12:42:32PM +0300, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
> It seems, that Mandrake Linux is going to use dietlibc:
> 
> http://www.fefe.de/dietlibc/mandrakesoft.txt
> 
> Here is a homepage of dietlibc:
> 
> http://www.fefe.de/dietlibc/
> 

Redhat is going the professionnal way and may try to target embedded
systems. The use of uClibc for us and for boot-floppies is enough.
-- 
Thierry LARONDE, Centre de Ressources Informatiques, Archamps - France
http://www.cri74.org/

Reply to:

References:
- Should you use dietlibc for installation and rescue disks?
  - From: Juhapekka Tolvanen <juhtolv@st.jyu.fi>

Prev by Date: Re: Should you use dietlibc for installation and rescue disks?
Next by Date: cvs commit to boot-floppies/utilities/dbootstrap by h.heinold
Previous by thread: Re: Should you use dietlibc for installation and rescue disks?
Next by thread: Re: Should you use dietlibc for installation and rescue disks?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread