Chris Tillman <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Well, yes and no. On debian-www robster got a little overwhelmed with
> the job and asked for some help, or for someone to take them over. No
> one responded, and josip said he's not aware of anyone working on
> them. Day before yesterday, I went through the current revision (from
> the location published in debian-www) with a fine-tooth comb, did some
> reorg etc., and posted it to debian-www. When no one commented on it,
> I committed the result into boot-floppies yesterday.
Oh excellent! You rock, Chris!
> So I think the current cvs version is actually pretty up-to-date. It
> still needs the list of renamed and split packages, and anything else
> needed along those lines, and some better review for potential gotchas
> people should know about. But it's in fairly good shape otherwise.
Good -- now if we could only get all this stuff published properly in
...Adam Di Carlo..<email@example.com>...<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>