[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#90204: marked as done ([doc] document how to configure network after install)



Your message dated 27 Sep 2001 21:34:43 -0400
with message-id <oa4rpo5c98.fsf@arroz.onshored.com>
and subject line bugs fixed in boot-floppies
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Mar 2001 05:09:08 +0000
>From whit@transpect.com Sun Mar 18 23:09:08 2001
Return-path: <whit@transpect.com>
Received: from china.patternbook.com (transpect.com) [216.254.75.60] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14erum-0005s1-00; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 23:09:08 -0600
Received: (from root@localhost)
	by transpect.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) id AAA00697
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 00:08:59 -0500
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 00:08:59 -0500
From: Whit <whit@transpect.com>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: installation process unclear when network card not found
Message-ID: <20010319000859.A608@www.transpect.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: boot-floppies
Version: 2.2.17

Using the vanilla installation, it didn't have my network card (3c905), so
it didn't offer the network setup options on installation. Since the system
is already running Red Hat, I compiled a fresh 2.2.19pre kernel and set a
Debian lilo option. Booting into Debian with it I looked around with the
question "Okay, what's the efficient Debian way to set up the network
options?" If there's a clue I can't find it. (On Red Hat this is the one
thing I usually use linuxconf for - after carefully disabling all its other
buggy functions - glad to see that shoddy utility's not in your base
install.)

There should also be an obvious way to go back to a bypassed network setup
once a proper kernel or module is in place. This should be mentioned in the
installation manual, or at the least the manual should reference whatever
the most convenient included utilities are that can be used in place of
various stages of the 'straightforward' process when things go deviant.

Why not have an option to go ahead and set up the networking options on the
first pass _even if the network card isn't recognized yet_? Does the user
really need to be protected from the possibility of doing this? Software
that tries to out think the user by removing options is often too clever by
half. The useful thing would be "If you have a NIC, I can't see it yet.
Would you like to make the network settings anyway?"

What I'm primarily asking for is an installation process and instructions
that make allowance for users who will compile their own kernels. Maybe
another of your kernels has 3c905 support - if I wanted to back out and
repeat everything I've done so far to get back on track that way, which I
don't - but there will always be hardware that no distro kernel will be
right for, and just 'cause someone wants to do the kernel 'the hard way'
shouldn't obligate them to forego modern conveniences in other stages of the
process.

I've found "dpkg-reconfigure base-config", which looks like it will complete
at least part of the installation once I have the network settings in place.
It should be simple to just copy them across from the Red Hat installation
...

 \/\/ I-I I T 
 Blauvelt
 whit@transpect.com

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 90204-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2001 01:18:38 +0000
>From adam@onshore-devel.com Thu Sep 27 20:18:38 2001
Return-path: <adam@onshore-devel.com>
Received: from arroz.onshored.com [216.220.101.2] (postfix)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 15mmIY-0000wr-00; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 20:18:38 -0500
Received: from arroz.onshored.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by arroz.onshored.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 02B8193808; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 21:34:43 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: adam@arroz.onshored.com
To: 98439-done@bugs.debian.org, 94208-done@bugs.debian.org,
	96793-done@bugs.debian.org, 98629-done@bugs.debian.org,
	90204-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: bugs fixed in boot-floppies
Organization: onShore Development, Inc
From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore-devel.com>
Date: 27 Sep 2001 21:34:43 -0400
Message-ID: <oa4rpo5c98.fsf@arroz.onshored.com>
Lines: 7
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: 90204-done@bugs.debian.org


Closing this bug, which has been fixed in boot floppies for a while
now, most likely.  Hopefully the problem you reported is really fixed.
If not, let us know, and/or reopen the bug.

-- 
...Adam Di Carlo..<adam@onshore-devel.com>...<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>



Reply to: