Re: busybox config.h
Ethan Benson <erbenson@alaska.net> writes:
> here is snippets of the current diff between my local busybox Config.h
> and the one in -4
Is this a reverse patch? Confused...
> +#define BB_FREE
>
> why do we need free?
When people run out of disk space, to run in tty2.
> -#define BB_GZIP
> +//#define BB_GZIP
>
> report a problem currently needs this, but i don't see any real need
> to gzip it, the tarball created by it is rather small anyway...
Even so, we want gzip on the root filesystem.
The rest I agree with you, generally, although I haven't done all the
research others have....
--
...Adam Di Carlo..<adam@onshore-devel.com>...<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>
Reply to: