Re: libm on root-filesystem?
Thimo Neubauer <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> I hate do do a self-reply but I tracked down the problem further:
> libslang needs all mathmatical functions on earth, because it provides
> wrappers for all of them.
That seems rather retarded...
> libnewt instead just needs a few of slangs
> functions, not including a math-function at all. Unfortunately the
> library reduction seems to only to see that there are unresolved
> symbols in libslang and includes all the math-stuff which is wrong
> because thos routines needing the math will be kicked out anyway (I
> checked this with objdump on the reduced libslang).
> Anyone able to teach the library reduction about this case? I do not
> dare after I read parts of the script...
Ouch. So its that libslang itself should be reduced, and based on
that, the usage in libnewt should be reduced?
Kinda sounds like an ordering problem....
Anyhow, I wonder if we should perhaps have a special libslang which we
use for boot-floppies which is already pre-stripped? I wonder how
doable that is.
How many bytes are needed for alpha, exactly?
.....Adam Di Carlo....email@example.com.....<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>