[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: configuration of base packages

Anthony Towns wrote:
> It's priority important, and other important packages depend on it, in
> particular mailx and at. I guess all three of those could be dropped to
> standard reasonably. Maybe. ?

Mailx does meet the criteria for important very well though.

Is there no way to have a package be priority important and skipped by

see shy jo

Reply to: