Re: 2.2.25 tagged and building (was Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM?)

To: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
Cc: debian-boot@lists.debian.org, debian-arm@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: 2.2.25 tagged and building (was Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM?)
From: Philip Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 08:40:36 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] E158Gsm-0001md-00@kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org>
In-reply-to: Message from Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com> of "07 Jun 2001 11:20:13 EDT." <[🔎] oazobkb9le.fsf_-_@arroz.fake>
References: <oa1ypwcvla.fsf@arroz.fake> <E14yLCh-0007xe-00@kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org> <oag0eb86ua.fsf@arroz.fake> <[🔎] 20010604123855.D24396@cistron.nl> <[🔎] oa8zj7lr74.fsf@arroz.fake> <[🔎] 20010606002817.C27690@cistron.nl> <[🔎] 20010606144741.I26589@cistron.nl> <[🔎] oazobkb9le.fsf_-_@arroz.fake>

>Ok, building 2.2.25 for i386 and source upload now.

Great.  I've started ARM builds of 2.2.25 and 2.3.5.

p.

Attachment: pgp9El0f0SXbV.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- 2.2.26 (potato) tagged and building
  - From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>

References:
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM?
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@valinux.com>
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM?
  - From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM?
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl>
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM?
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@valinux.com>
- 2.2.25 tagged and building (was Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM?)
  - From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>