Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM?

To: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@valinux.com>
Cc: debian-boot@lists.debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM?
From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
Date: 04 Jun 2001 20:13:03 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] oa8zj7lr74.fsf@arroz.fake>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20010604123855.D24396@cistron.nl>
References: <oa1ypwcvla.fsf@arroz.fake> <E14yLCh-0007xe-00@kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org> <oag0eb86ua.fsf@arroz.fake> <[🔎] 20010604123855.D24396@cistron.nl>

Wichert Akkerman <wichert@valinux.com> writes:

> Previously Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > Ok.  I am not moving i386 to straigh 2.2.19 right now, btw, since I'm
> > pretty sure that kernel has issues.
> 
> What kind of issues are you referring to?

I checked and they are ok.

Should I prepare new Potato boot-floppies with 2.2.19 for i386?

That's the only change , aside from some documentation updates.

-- 
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onshore.com.....<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM?
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl>
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM?
  - From: Matt Kraai <kraai@debian.org>

References:
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM?
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@valinux.com>

Prev by Date: cvs commit to boot-floppies by h.heinold
Next by Date: cvs commit to boot-floppies/debian by aph
Previous by thread: Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM?
Next by thread: Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread