Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody
"Christian T. Steigies" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 02:40:50PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > Nobody is working on m68k boot floppies for Woody at the moment. This
> > is a bad situation. Unless m68k porters start working on getting
> > things going for their architecture, won't that mean we don't have an
> > install system and m68k will not be able to participate in the Woody
> > release?
> Which is more important, bf for potato or bf for woody?
At this juncture I would say woody.
.....Adam Di Carlo....email@example.com.....<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>