Re: Busybox vi
On Thu May 03, 2001 at 11:02:56AM -0700, Andrew Sharp wrote:
> Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 07:55:40AM -0700, Andrew Sharp wrote:
> > > > The only real downside to uClibc is its limited platform support.
> > > > Right now I support x86, arm, m68k, sh, and powerpc. The shared
> > > ^^
> > > I'm not familiar with the `sh' platform. Did you mean sparc?
> > SuperH.
> Ahh. Ohh. Ooh. Yumm. ~:^) I guess sparc is out of luck?
> Anecdotally, I've found that most things that make powerpc work also
> work for sparc, and vice versa. Ah heck, nobody cares about sparc
> anyway, right? ~:^)
I've got about 3/4 of a sparc port done. Just never finished it...
Erik B. Andersen email: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--