Re: Busybox vi

[Erik Andersen <andersen@codepoet.org>]

On Thu May 03, 2001 at 11:02:56AM -0700, Andrew Sharp wrote:
> Branden Robinson wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 07:55:40AM -0700, Andrew Sharp wrote:
> > > > The only real downside to uClibc is its limited platform support.
> > > > Right now I support x86, arm, m68k, sh, and powerpc.  The shared
> > >                                       ^^
> > > I'm not familiar with the `sh' platform.  Did you mean sparc?
> > 
> > SuperH.
> 
> Ahh. Ohh. Ooh. Yumm.  ~:^)  I guess sparc is out of luck? 
> Anecdotally, I've found that most things that make powerpc work also
> work for sparc, and vice versa.  Ah heck, nobody cares about sparc
> anyway, right?  ~:^)

I've got about 3/4 of a sparc port done.  Just never finished it...

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen   email:  andersee@debian.org, andersen@lineo.com
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--