Re: busybox insmod
Erik Andersen wrote:
> I'd love to. There is one little problem. Or rather, there are several
> little problems, specifically, alpha, hppa, m68k, mips, ppc, and sparc.
> Busybox insmod requires a little bit of arch specific code for each
> arch. So far, only x86, arm, and sh are supported. So if I turn it on,
> I will get nasty emails from the autobuilders saying:
> #error Sorry, but insmod.c does not yet support this architecture...
Ugh. Not having an insmod may stall d-i development, since we're pretty
close to having a bootable disk that can get up on the net. I don't
think the big insmod is really an option:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 83k Jan 9 07:54 /sbin/insmod*
At this point, I think it'd be best to enable it, and take the bug
reports. At least d-i development could continue on i386. Maybe it would
even motivate someone to send you patches..
> Excellent. BTW, going to LinuxWorld?
see shy jo