Re: bogl forked (was Re: [patch] bogl memset_var for 32 bpp screen)
Daniel Jacobowitz <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 08:27:51PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > Daniel Jacobowitz <email@example.com> writes:
> > > Sorry for not being clear - yes, I know that bterm has the same bug.
> > > I'd appreciate it if someone on this list would look into using the
> > > bogl and bterm in that package, so that we can scrap the one in
> > > debian-boot CVS; having both makes me nervous about lost work.
> > I guess we'll plan on using straight bogl from woody for the woody
> > boot floppies. I hate forking. I'm not sure why we forked
> > it... Maybe Marcin (or was it Marcel?) can explain it?
> We didn't fork it for boot floppies; it was originally there. I added
> new bogl packages to woody for debian-installer, though, a month ago.
> At that point it was effectively forked - mostly my fault.
Oh. Ok. So -- am I correct in concluding that boot-floppies for
woody should rely on using bogl from woody (the .deb, b-f can't use
udebs) and not the internal stuff?
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>