[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#80325: AW: Bug#80325: Re: Bug#80325: how compact, vanilla and fdisk see the partition table

It seems that we have two interacting bugs, as far as I can

  libfdisk, and therefore dbootstrap, was ordering *BSD slices
  incorrectly with respect to extended partitions; they should be put
  *after* the extended partitons, but they weren't being

  the compact and idepci kernels don't have BSD disklabel support; all
  installation kernels need to be consistent (vanilla, udma66, idepci,

I'm having a hard time to slog through all the messages and such, but
if anyone has some counter-evidence to my conclusion above, I'd like
to hear it.

Thanks to all you great bug testers for the the time.

.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>

Reply to: