[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#80325: how compact, vanilla and fdisk see the partition table



Hi Adam,

I have checked the kernel flavor of my boot floppies. It was 'vanilla',
as you probably expected. 

Since you indicated that the kernel flavor might make a difference, I
also tried the root.bin and rescue.bin floppies of the 'compact' flavor,
which is the only alternative that makes sense on my machine. In each
case, I checked the option 'view partition table' immediately after the
installer started. For each flavor, here are the partition tables as the
installer sees them.


Compact
=======

Device       Mounted on             Type
----------   -------------------    ----
/dev/sda1    -- Not mounted --      Linux native
/dev/sda2    -- Not available --    NeXTSTEP 486
/dev/sda3    -- Not available --    BSD/386
/dev/sda5    -- Not available --    4.2 BSD
/dev/sda6    -- Not available --    BSD swap
/dev/sda7    -- Not available --    4.2 BSD
/dev/sda8    -- Not available --    4.2 BSD
/dev/sda4    -- Not available --    DOS Extended
/dev/sda9    -- Not in use --       Linux swap


Vanilla
=======

Device       Mounted on             Type
----------   ------------------     --------
/dev/sda1    -- Not mounted --      Linux native
/dev/sda2    -- Not available --    NeXTSTEP 486
/dev/sda3    -- Not available --    BSD/386
/dev/sda5    -- Not available --    4.2 BSD
/dev/sda6    -- Not available --    BSD swap
/dev/sda7    -- Not available --    4.2 BSD
/dev/sda8    -- Not available --    4.2 BSD
/dev/sda9    -- Not in use --       Linux swap
/dev/sda10   -- Not mounted --      Linux native
/dev/sda11   -- Not mounted --      Linux native
/dev/sda12   -- Not mounted --      Linux native
/dev/sda13   -- Not mounted --      Linux native

So there is no difference in the way 'vanilla' and 'compact' see the
Free BSD partitions. The difference is that 'compact' ignores some Linux
partitions on the extended partition. 

Just to get the record straight, here is the partition table as seen by
fdisk. Also, this is essentially how the installers of Red Hat, OpenStep
and Free BSD see it. (Of course, Free BSD recognizes the BSD slices.)

Name   Flags   Part Type   FS Type       Label     Size (MB)
----   -----   ---------   ----------    -----     ---------
sda1           Primary     Linux ext2    [/]        106.35
sda2           Primary     NeXTSTEP                1050.67
sda3   Boot    Primary     BSD/386                  837.98
sda5           Logical     Linux swap               106.35
sda6           Logical     Linux ext2    [/tmp]     421.12
sda7           Logical     Linux ext2    [/home]    106.35
sda8           Logical     Linux ext2    [/var]     106.35
sda9           Logical     Linux ext2    [/usr]    1599.39



Hope that helps,

Thomas

PS: Sorry about the endless one-line messages I sent yesterday. I'll
never send     you mails with Outlook again, I promise!



Reply to: