Re: compact flavor definately messed

[Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>]

Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> writes:

> Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com> wrote:
> 
> > I'm having two problems on the compact flavor 2.2.18 i386, using the
> > kernel/pcmcia for 2.2.17 (not the pre versions, the pcmcia from potato
> > and the rejected kernel-image-2.2.17* packages).
> 
> The pcmcia modules in potato are compiled for pre6, aren't they? In which
> case there is no way that they're going to work with the real 2.2.17 kernels.
> If you need to build the boot floppies to test the parts other than the
> kernel, using the 2.2.17pre6 images from potato should work.

I'm not using the ones from potato.  I'm using the set I last had
before the rejections:

  kernel-image-2.2.17-compact_2.2.17-0.1_i386.deb
  kernel-image-2.2.17-ide_2.2.17-1_i386.deb
  kernel-image-2.2.17-idepci_2.2.17-0.1_i386.deb
  kernel-image-2.2.17_2.2.17-1_i386.deb
  pcmcia-cs_3.1.20-2_i386.deb
  pcmcia-modules-2.2.17-compact_3.1.20-2+Custom.1.00_i386.deb
  pcmcia-modules-2.2.17-ide_3.1.20-2k1_i386.deb
  pcmcia-modules-2.2.17-idepci_3.1.20-2+Custom.1.00_i386.deb
  pcmcia-modules-2.2.17_3.1.20-2k1_i386.deb

Unfortunately, even these don't work --
pcmcia-modules-2.2.17-compact_3.1.20-2+Custom.1.00_i386.deb at least
is bad. 

Is there anyone that has a set for me?  Should I remake pcmcia modules
for compact based on kernel-image-2.2.17-{idepci,compact} ?

-- 
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>