Re: debian-installer main menu almost done
Anthony Towns wrote:
> - struct package_t *p = (struct package_t **)nodep;
> + struct package_t *p = (struct package_t *)nodep;
Hm, I thought I tried that.
> Assuming _tree_Free is actually not segfaulting as written.
Nope, it looks weird, but it's correct.
> > * Figure out how to handle configuring only one virtual package (pick off
> > of a menu?) if the menu item depends on a virtual package.
>
> I'm not quite sure how the details would work, but maybe you could make
> a question for each dependency that can be satisfied by multiple udebs,
> and just query that each time it's needed.
That's a pretty good idea.
> Having looked at where d-i is upto, and how far it's got to go, I'm
> inclined to think that aiming for d-i to be the installer for woody (for
> all architectures, for all environments) isn't completely unreasonable.
> We'll probably have to make a definite decision which one to go with
> for woody by the end of November, though, to make sure we've got time
> to hack on b-f if we need to.
You're more optimistic than me, but I guess we'll see where we are and
how many people are contributing code by the end of November.
--
see shy jo
Reply to: