Nick Holgate wrote:
> +#define FALSE ((int) 1)
> +#define TRUE ((int) 0)
This is contrary to usual logic which says that
if (3>2) {
whatever
}
and
if (TRUE) {
whatever
}
should be the equivalent things.
Why not change the "wrong" definitions of TRUE and FALSE in whatever place
they are found, instead of propagating this madness even more?