[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Pedro Guerreiro <digito@bigfoot.com>] Re: Greek keymaps in boot-floppies -- m68k and powerpc porters please read



User mistaken sent mail to me alone, thinking I knew about this stuff,
probably.

--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 09:53:09PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Pedro Guerreiro <digito@bigfoot.com> writes:
> 
> > Another thing in kbdconfig.c are the definitions of the sparc
> > keymaps: The only ones there are the sun/*, but keymaps.sh list all
> > from i386/* too. One of them should be fixed, but I've no ideia of
> > which.
> 
> Why is that wrong?  On my sparc, I use an i386 keyboard...

How's that set up? In kbdconfig.c there's nothing relating the sparc arch with
any keyboard except the sun's.

---- cut from kbdconfig.c ----

#elif #cpu (sparc)
  struct d_choices keymaps[]={
    { "sunkeymap",       "U.S. English (QWERTY)"     , KBD_C},
    { "sunt5-fi-latin1", "Finland (Type 5)"          , KBD_fi_FI},
    { "sunt5-fr-latin1", "France (Type 5)"           , KBD_fr_FR},
    { "sunt5-de-latin1", "Germany (Type 5)"          , KBD_de_DE},
    { "sunt5-ru",        "Russia (Type 5)"           , KBD_ru_RU},
    { "sunt4-es",        "Spain (Type 4)"            , KBD_es_ES},
    { "sunt5-es",        "Spain (Type 5)", 0},
  };
#else

[removed different archs stuff...]

#elif #cpu (sparc)
    prefix="sun";
    choices= keymaps;
    nchoices=sizeof(keymaps)/sizeof(struct d_choices);
#elif #cpu (powerpc)
	    
---- end cut from kbdconfig.c ----

Should all the i386 keymaps go into the kbdconfig.c file, or am I missing
something? One problem that I've just realise is about the prefix. 
All sun keyboards are in sun/* dir, and this is the prefix for sparc's
keymaps.

Can/should this be setup as the m68k arch, where inside it there is subarchs
(amiga, Atari, Macintosh)? Or am I trying to fix something that it's not
broken? (It is known to have happen. :-)

Bye,
pmg



--- End Message ---
-- 
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>

Reply to: