Re: is rescue really the right word?
In reference to a message from Joey Hess, dated Feb 11:
> Now that the rescue disk is split in two, "rescue.bin" is really just a
> kernel, and is by itself useless as a rescue floppy. Maybe we should go the
> slackware way and call them boot and root?
keep in mind that i386 is in the minority here -- most of the other archs
still have rescue and root on one disk afaik. on i386, the 2.88M disks are
also boot+root.
other than that... i think boot+root sounds fine :)
randolph
--
Debian Developer <tausq@debian.org>
http://www.TauSq.org/
Reply to: