Re: [vague discussion] woody boot-floppies plans
Adam Di Carlo <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> I however think the approach of using the whiptail lib and racheting
> in fb support may not be not right -- it might never work like we want
What exactly *do* we want from the GUI interface, or from the
boot floppies interface in general? (If you stated this
somewhere else in the thread just point me to the message.)
> It's up to the next boot-floppies leader after me, but I would thinkt
> he first thing would be to try to get a nice fb iface for debconf...
Hmm, good point.