Re: kbd or console-tools,data ?

To: Debian Boot <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: kbd or console-tools,data ?
From: Michael Sobolev <mss@transas.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 17:16:10 +0300
Message-id: <[🔎] 20000127171610.A18512@transas.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20000127102726.A25534@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>; from luther@debian.org on Thu, Jan 27, 2000 at 10:27:26AM +0100
References: <[🔎] 20000126194445.H3145@isis.de> <[🔎] oau2k0haer.fsf@arroz.fake> <[🔎] 20000127102726.A25534@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>

On Thu, Jan 27, 2000 at 10:27:26AM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> kbd is unusable anyway, since there is no more kbd-data in the archive.

$ apt-cache show kbd | fgrep Depends
Depends: ... console-data (>> 1999.08.29-3) ...
$

--
Mike

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: kbd or console-tools,data ?
  - From: Sven LUTHER <luther@debian.org>

References:
- kbd or console-tools,data ?
  - From: Hartmut Koptein <koptein@inwestnet.de>
- Re: kbd or console-tools,data ?
  - From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
- Re: kbd or console-tools,data ?
  - From: Sven LUTHER <luther@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: boot-floppies and potato cd in harmony?
Next by Date: hacked strip_executables.sh
Previous by thread: Re: kbd or console-tools,data ?
Next by thread: Re: kbd or console-tools,data ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread